Clare L. Deming

Reading Artificial Wisdom by Thomas R. Weaver was not in my plans for the year since I had never heard of either the book or the author (paid link). This novel was suggested to me by NetGalley and the description did sound like something I might like, so I agreed to read it. Find out what I thought below.

Here is the blurb:

It’s 2050, a decade after a heatwave that killed four hundred million across the Persian Gulf, including journalist Marcus Tully’s wife. Now he must uncover the truth: was the disaster natural? Or is the weather now a weapon of genocide?

A whistleblower pulls Tully into a murder investigation at the centre of an election battle for a global dictator, with a mandate to prevent a climate apocalypse. A former US President campaigns against the first AI politician for the position, but someone is trying to sway the outcome.

Tully must convince the world to face the truth and make hard choices about the future of the species. But will humanity ultimately choose salvation over freedom, whatever the cost?

I loved so much of this book and (not knowing much of what to expect going in) found myself swept up in a wild sci-fi thriller following a group of investigative reporters as they followed a lead with huge political ramifications. Set in a near future where only the ultra-rich can protect themselves from the coming climate catastrophe, the plot is filled with surprising turns and unpredictable betrayals.

Marcus Tully worked well as a protagonist for me, although we do get some chapters from other points of view. The personal tragedy in his past is used to provide sympathy, show his flaws, and lead him deeper into schemes that he only partially understands. One of his colleagues is also a main player in the events, and the others were as developed as they needed to be for their more distant involvement.

For much of the book, it is difficult to know the identity of the antagonist, which is often a problem for me in novels. However, in this book it worked well because it deepened the suspense by making the enemy a hidden threat. I did figure out part of the ending before reaching it, but as in much of the book, the full truth twisted the part I had guessed into something more interesting.

This book also incorporated timely issues like the use of AI, climate change, and capitalism and corporate greed without ever becoming completely about any of them.

My one criticism of this book was that the final part of the ending didn’t work for me. I don’t want to give any spoilers, but I felt like it didn’t provide the answers I had wanted, although the questions that the book asked were hard ones. It wasn’t a cliff-hanger, but rather an anti-climactic conclusion after all the action and suspense that led me through the book. It does look like a sequel is planned, so I can hope that that will give me the resolution I’m looking for. I’d still highly recommend this book – other readers might love the finale, as a quick scan of other online reviews shows.

I could see this book being developed into a movie or television series. What books have you read that you think would work well on the big screen? Let me know in the comments.

You can find more of my reviews here.